Legal Opinion

Campbell Motor Co. v. Stanfield.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 6, 1926No. 8 Div. 848PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Suit in detinue by appellant against appellee for recovery of a Ford car. Plaintiff relied for recovery upon a mortgage, duly recorded, executed by one Gray, to whom plaintiff had sold the car, permitting him to have the possession and use thereof. About one month from the date of sale the car was badly damaged by Gray, and was carried by him to the garage of Young and Poore for repairs, which were made, and considerable expense incurred. The repair bill was not paid, and defendant’s title is that of a purchaser at a public sale of the car, had pursuant to the enforcement of the statutory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watts v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. J. A. Broom & Son v. S. S. Dale & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
  3. J. C. Walden Auto Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  4. Mathers v. BarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tallassee Motor Co. v. Gilliland Bros.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Ellis Motor Co. v. HibblerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Jordan v. J. E. Rotten & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Wyatt v. Drennen Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Campbell Motor Co. v. StanfieldAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API