Legal Opinion

Jordan v. J. E. Rotten & Co.

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1930No. 5 Div. 769PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

The plaintiffs in this suit are mechanics, and as such claim a lien on a certain Ford car for work and repairs and parts furnished for said car at the request of the owner. They seek to enforce their statutory lien under section 8863 of the Code of 1923, by attachment as is provided by statute. So far as the defendant in the original suit is concerned, the plaintiffs’ right seems clear and undisputed. But this claimant claims priority by reason of a mortgage on the automobile executed by defendant to him on June 15, 1928, and duly recorded in the office of the judge of probate of Olay county…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Mobile Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. J. C. Walden Auto Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Tallassee Motor Co. v. Gilliland Bros.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Ellis Motor Co. v. HibblerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. Campbell Motor Co. v. Stanfield.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richardson Tractor Company v. Square Deal MacHinery & Supply CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. W. S. Brewbaker, Inc. v. McClintonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Billingsley v. McRaeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Grace v. WooleyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Owens v. TarletonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API