Legal Opinion

United States v. Southland Provision Co.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided December 15, 1970No. 69-627-Civ-JPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CHARLES R. SCOTT, District Judge.

This is a suit by the United States of America to recover for alleged conversion of personal property. The government contends that the defendants did receive and sell, for the account of James E. and Barbara F. Simmons, certain chattels; namely: hogs, which were subject to a recorded mortgage held by the government. The original promissory note executed by the Simmonses, and later secured by the mortgage, remains unpaid, and for that reason this action was commenced.

The defendants have moved for a judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Rule 12(c),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. McCleskey Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. C. T. H. Corporation v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Dekle v. CalhounSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. J. G. White Engineering Corp. v. Peoples State Bank of LakelandSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Nathan Borock, as Receiver of Voges Manufacturing Company, Inc., Radar Holding Corporation and Fred W. Voges v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. SquiresDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1974
  2. United States v. Chesley's Sales, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. United States v. CrawfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API