United States Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEROW, Judge:
This tax refund matter comes before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and supporting materials submitted for the record, it is concluded that plaintiff is entitled to a partial refund and summary judgment is granted, to the extent indicated herein, in favor of plaintiff. The parties’ motions are, otherwise, denied.
Facts
The plaintiff, United States Steel Corporation (USS), is a corporation engaged in the production and sale of a wide range of steel products. USS also engages in the production, refining, transportation…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Commissioner v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sutphin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- United States Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- United States Steel Corporation, and Affiliated Companies v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988