People v. Ceccone
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoss, J.
—Defendant was convicted of possession of marijuana in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11530. He was granted probation on condition that he pay a fine. The trial commenced on October 24, 1966, and, therefore, this case is controlled by the rules stated in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 [16 L.Ed.2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974], (People v. Rollins, 65 Cal.2d 681 [56 Cal.Rptr. 293, 423 P.2d 221].) Defendant’s appeal raises the question whether a statement made by him to the arresting officer at the scene of the arrest stemmed from a “custodial interrogation” as that term is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. ManisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Heinemann v. Whitman CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.