Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Bertsch

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

— This action was brought by respondent to remove- appellant from the office of probate judge of Butte county. The information contained forty-seven counts specifying instances in which appellant had charged and collected illegal fees for services rendered in his office and in which he had neglected to perform official duties pertaining to his office. The court sustained a demurrer to all of the counts except the first thirty-five, all of which alleged the charging and collecting of illegal fees for services rendered in his office of probate judge. On the trial the court found all of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McRoberts v. HoarIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Collman v. WanamakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rose v. Superior Court of Imperial Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. King v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Daniels v. WrightonIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Opinion No. 73-110 (1973) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API