In re Corn
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentRhonda K. Wood, Justice
I dissent. James Corn has attempted an end-run around federal Medicaid law and Arkansas trust law. While I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in its particular analysis, I. would still affirm the circuit court because, as a matter of law, the trust cannot be created in this case. . First, a “D4A” trust cannot be self-settled. Second, the circuit court cannot settle a trust, in the first instance, with assets that are controlled by someone else.
Neither Corn nor the majority makes any attempt to describe how we should review this case.1 In any event, courts of equity…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- HOBBS EX. REL. HOBBS v. ZendermanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Burnette v. Perkins & AssociatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Stephany Draper v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Dawkins v. PetteysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Neal v. HolkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.