Legal Opinion

In re Cahill

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 2, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Following recommendation of trial committee.

The Louisville Bar Association, on relation of its Executive Committee, filed a complaint before the Kentucky State Board of Bar Commissioners, charging re*868spondent Frank R. Cahill, Jr., a member of the Louisville Bar, with six separate counts of unprofessional conduct. Evidence was taken relative to the issues, and Honorable Maxey- B. Harlin and Honorable Parker W. Duncan, who constituted the trial committee , of the B;ar Commissioners, found respondent not guilty as to charges 1 to 5 inclusive, hut guilty of charge 6, and recommended his suspension…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Okl. Bar Ass'n v. McNaughtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McMurrayWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. In re GordonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API