Legal Opinion

Hoheb v. Muriel

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 21, 1985No. 83-3588PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge:

Herbert J. Muriel, Newfound Corporation, and Gulf Caribbean Development Corporation, the defendants in an action seeking rescission of a real estate transaction, appeal from an order of the District Court of the Virgin Islands denying their Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 19 motion to dismiss for failure to join necessary parties, or to join such parties. The trial court determined that the order denying that motion “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chidester v. City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. ICON Group, Inc. v. Mahogany Run Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Icon Group, Inc. v. Mahogany Run Development Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
  3. Icon Group, Inc. v. Mahogany Run Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  4. Hoheb v. MurielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. FrancisDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API