Legal Opinion
Icon Group, Inc. v. Mahogany Run Development Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided September 30, 1987No. 86-3633PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from the district court’s dismissal of the complaint of plaintiff-appellant ICON Group, Inc. (“ICON”), 112 F.R.D. 201. Finding that joinder of certain interested non-parties was required under Federal Rules 17 and 19, the district court, on two occasions, ordered ICON to join those non-parties. After concluding that ICON had not complied with either of its *475directives, the district court dismissed ICON’S complaint without prejudice. Because we find that ICON complied, substantially if not fully, with the district…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William M. Haas v. Jefferson National Bank of Miami Beach, and Charles H. Glueck, New PartyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Clarkson Co. v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
- Hoheb v. MurielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Prudential Lines, Inc. v. General Tire International Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Icon Group, Inc. v. Mahogany Run Development Corp.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Susan Esposito Thorstenn and Lloyd De Vos v. Geoffrey W. Barnard, as Chairman of the Committee of Bar Examiners of the Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Thorstenn v. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987