Legal Opinion
Estate of Schwing v. Lilly Health Plan
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 2012No. Civil Action No. 03-cv-04848PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES KNOLL GARDNER, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendants’ Petition for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs filed September 30, 2011.1 Plaintiff, Estate of Kevin Schwing’s Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Petition for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs was filed October 14, 2011.2
Oral argument was conducted before me on May 3, 2012. The matter was taken under advisement. Hence this Opinion.
For the following reasons, I deny Defendants’ Petition for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs. Specifically, I conclude that defendants have shown some degree of success on the merits. However,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Estate of Schwing v. the Lilly Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Paul F. McPherson v. Employees' Pension Plan of American Re-Insurance Company, Inc. Pension Committee of Employees' Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ASKEW v. R.L. REPPERT, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- CAMPBELL v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF BRYN MAWR TRUST COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022