Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Hyde

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1940No. 30790PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsen, J.

The State on relation of the Nebraska State Bar Association instituted disciplinary proceedings against respondent as an attorney. Robert 0. Reddish was appointed by the court as referee, and the record of the hearing had before him and his report have been duly filed. Respondent has filed no exceptions to the referee’s report, and the state now moves that the report be approved and confirmed, and that an appropriate disciplinary order be entered.

It is unnecessary to set out all the charges or to make a detailed review of the evidence. The referee has found, and the record amply supports his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Spillman v. PriestNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. GoldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Wright v. SowardsNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State ex rel. Hunter v. HatterothNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State ex rel. Hunter v. MarconnitNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. NiklausNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. HungerfordNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. BlanchardNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API