Legal Opinion

Greenleaf v. Profile Cotton Mills

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1938No. 7 Div. 497PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

It is unquestionably the rule in this state that where a bill in equity, as distinguished from a complaint at law, discloses on its face that the relief sought is barred by the statutes of limitations or laches, the same is subject to demurrer. But-the question here is, Does the present bill disclose limitations or laches as would cut off the complainant’s right to the relief sought ?

The bill 'charges that the respondent, Greenleaf, was continuously president and general manager .of the corporation for a number of years up to April, 1934, just two years before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coxe v. Huntsville Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Mobile Land Improvement Co. v. GassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Adams v. Alabama Lime Stone CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Jefferson County Truck Growers Ass'n v. TannerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Belcher v. Birmingham Trust National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
  5. Clark v. MilamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API