Greenleaf v. Profile Cotton Mills
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
It is unquestionably the rule in this state that where a bill in equity, as distinguished from a complaint at law, discloses on its face that the relief sought is barred by the statutes of limitations or laches, the same is subject to demurrer. But-the question here is, Does the present bill disclose limitations or laches as would cut off the complainant’s right to the relief sought ?
The bill 'charges that the respondent, Greenleaf, was continuously president and general manager .of the corporation for a number of years up to April, 1934, just two years before the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coxe v. Huntsville Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1894
- Mobile Land Improvement Co. v. GassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Adams v. Alabama Lime Stone CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hecht v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Jefferson County Truck Growers Ass'n v. TannerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Belcher v. Birmingham Trust National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
- Clark v. MilamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.