Adams v. Alabama Lime Stone Corporation

(after stating the case as above).

We deal first with the merits of the alleged demand of $30,621.95 presented by the bill as a set-off against the Adams judgment against complainant.

Taking the averments of the bill as a whole, it is not shown 'that the holder of the Dimmick mortgage was a party to any of the alleged agreements; nor is it denied that the mortgage continued to be - an incumbrance upon the property purchased by complainant.

Construing the bill most strongly against the pleader, we infer the property was conveyed to complainant; that such lands, or the proceeds, are still held by…