Legal Opinion

Miller v. Siden

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 12, Calendar No. 35,923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, J.

Plaintiff, claiming right of possession of a certain boiler, as mortgagee in a chattel mortgage given for its purchase price, filed a petition under the declaratory judgment law (3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 13903 et seq.), to recover possession from defendant, who claims to be the owner free of the mortgage.

The proper action is replevin. The proceeding for declaratory judgment is not a substitute nor alternative for the common-law actions. Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. Ayres, 254 Mich. 58, 62.

Judgment for plaintiff reversed, without new trial, and without prejudice to bring the proper action.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Brindley v. MearaIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Updegraff v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gray v. DefaUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Land O' Lakes Dairy Co. v. Village of SebekaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API