Legal Opinion
Updegraff v. Attorney General
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1941No. Docket No. 87, Calendar No. 41,622PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.
On April 3, 1940, plaintiff filed a petition for a declaratory judgment under the provisions of Act No. 36, Pub. Acts 1929, being 3 Comp. Laws 1929, §§ 13903-13909 (Stat. Ann. §27.501 et seq.). He alleged that he was being prosecuted before a justice of the peace for a misdemeanor aris ing through his failure to observe the quarantine on dogs, as proclaimed by the governor for the period between December 27, 1939, and March 27, 1940, tinder Act No. 181, Pub. Acts 1919, as amended; that he is the owner of a Great Dane dog that has been vaccinated for rabies; that the dog has not attacked or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woollard v. Schaffer Stores Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Colson v. PelgramNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Village of Grosse Pointe Shores v. AyresMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Flint v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Lash v. City of Traverse CityMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Herald Publishing Co. v. BillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Welfare Employees Union v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Grimm v. Co. Comm'rs of Wash. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.