Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Ernst & Young

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 21, 1994No. C-1-91-196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STEINBERG, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case is before the Court following motions for summary judgment, arguments thereon, and responsive pleadings. (Docs. 162, 163, 165, 166). Plaintiff P. LaRue Simpson brings this action against Ernst & Young alleging claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.; Age Discrimination By Employers, Ohio Revised Code § 4101.17; the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA); as well as an Ohio common law unjust enrichment claim. The Court dismissed the latter claim. (Doc. 101).

Simpson contends that he…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. P. Larue Simpson v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Strother v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Keshishian v. CMC RadiologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Rhoads v. Jones Financial CompaniesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
  5. 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,979, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1610, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2734 Germaine D. Strother, M.D. v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group, a California Partnership Gary A. Lulejian, an Individual David Bridgeford, an Individual, Germaine D. Strother, M.D. v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group Gary A. Lulejian, an Individual David Bridgeford, an Individual Paul Deiter, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API