Legal Opinion

Charles Pfizer and Company v. Branch

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 8, 1963No. 3780PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Chief Justice.

Leonard Branch’s minor sons owned two calves that had just been “worked” which they intended to develop as 4 — H Club calves. Mr. Branch bought “Combiotic” from a store in Stonewall County. It was manufactured, sold and distributed by Charles Pfizer and Company, Inc., for the purpose of having it injected into animals by its purchasers to prevent infection. Mr. Branch properly injected the Combiotic. There was a severe reaction. One calf died within fifteen minutes after the injection. Mr. Branch tried unsuccessfully to obtain the services of a veterinarian but was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Florence Wright and Roy Wright v. Carter Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. BaridonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. Mid-West Oil Corp. v. EisnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Technical Chemical Company v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ford Motor Company v. Marvin R. MathisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Maintenance & Equipment Contractors v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Muncy v. Magnolia Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API