Legal Opinion
Plainfield v. Middlesex Borough
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 14, 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
69 N.J. Super. 136 (1961)
173 A.2d 785
JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD, AND THE BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN, AND THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, THE BOROUGH OF NORTH PLAINFIELD, AND THE BOROUGH OF DUNELLEN, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BOROUGH OF MIDDLESEX, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided September 14, 1961.
Messrs. Stryker, Tams & Dill (Mr. Walter F. Waldau appearing), attorneys for plaintiffs.
Messrs. Rafferty & Blacher (Mr. John J. Rafferty appearing), attorneys for defendant.
MOLINEUX, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
This is an action in lieu of prerogative…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Kozesnik v. Township of MontgomerySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Miller v. Beaver FallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spaeth v. City of PlymouthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Sheerr v. Evesham Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- E. Rutherford Industrial Park v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Rippley v. City of LincolnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.