National Labor Relations Board v. Hood Corporation and Contractors' Equipment Supply Company, Dba Cesco
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
Respondent, Hood Corporation, et al., (hereinafter referred to as Company), is engaged in the business of constructing gas pipelines in Idaho, Montana, and North Dakota. On March 22, 1963, the International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 370, AFL-CIO (hereinafter referred to as the Union) and the Respondent entered into a Consent Election Agreement in the usual form. The agreement was approved by the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board on March 27, 1963, and provided in pertinent part:
“Said election shall be held in accordance with the National…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. W. Rex CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- National Labor Relations Board v. Carlton Wood Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sumner Sand & Gravel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Elm City Broadcasting Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- National Labor Relations Board v. Volney Felt Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mike O'COnnOr Chevrolet-Buick-Gmc Co., Inc. And Pat O'COnnOr Chevrolet-Buick-Gmc Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Yoshio Uyeda v. Jerome H. Brooks, Acting Regional Director, Seventh Region, National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Swift & Co. v. SolienDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cadillac Steel Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- National Labor Relations Board v. Continental Nut CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.