In Re Hayes
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Chief Judge.
To be released, Hayes must have shown by a preponderance of the evidence either that he is no longer mentally ill, G.S. § 122C-3(21), or that he is no longer dangerous to others, G.S. § 122C-3(ll)b. See G.S. § 122C-276.1. We note that we denied Hayes’ 1992 request to be released in In re Hayes, 111 N.C. App. 384, 432 S.E.2d 862, appeal dismissed, 335 N.C. 173, 436 S.E.2d 376 (1993), hereinafter “Hayes I.”
In his brief, Hayes argues that the statutory definition of “mentally ill” applied here is unconstitutionally vague. See G.S. § 122C-3(21). The record reveals that Hayes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. StagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Matter of CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Peace River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ward Transformer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re HayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- In Re HayesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002