Legal Opinion

Shelby v. Action Scaffolding, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1992No. CV-90-0102-PRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

This case requires us to construe various provisions of Arizona’s Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act (UCATA), A.R.S. §§ 12-2501 to -2509. Defendant Action Scaffolding, Inc. seeks review of the court of appeals’ opinion holding that the amount a plaintiff receives in settlement from a joint tortfeasor is to be deducted from the plaintiff’s damages as determined by the jury before reducing those damages in proportion to the plaintiff’s relative degree of fault. Shelby v. Action Scaffolding, Inc., 164 Ariz. 302, 792 P.2d 765 (App. 1990); see A.R.S. §§ 12-2504,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ayala v. OlaizCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. Shelby v. Action Scaffolding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Jimenez v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. McBride v. CHEVRON USAMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Neil v. KavenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API