Legal Opinion

Neil v. Kavena

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 31, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 91-326PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether a non-settling defendant in a medical malpractice action, who is severally liable, is entitled to a credit of the amount received by the plaintiffs in settlement of a related action for the same injury from other defendants. For the following reasons, we reverse the trial court’s determination that the defendant is entitled to such a credit.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The facts are undisputed. On August 27, 1987, Cedric Kavena, M.D., and Joseph Vander Veer, M.D., performed gallbladder surgery on Catherine Neil at Good…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Wilson v. GaltNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Charles v. Giant Eagle MarketsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Dietz v. General Electric Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kussman v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. D'ANGELO v. FitzmauriceSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  3. Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Gouty v. SchnepelSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. State v. WanzekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API