Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Canadian Pacific Nav. Co.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 1, 1902No. 1,070PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a New Trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

Briefly stated, the complaint in this case alleges that on or about the 8th day of March, 1899, plaintiff, Gibson, was employed by the defendant at the *408town of Skagway as a longshoreman to assist in the unlading of the steamer Tees, a vessel owned by the defendant, the unlading of which was being conducted under the supervision of the agents and officers of -said defendant; that while the plaintiff was engaged in the work of unloading said vessel, through the negligence, carelessness, and mismanagement of said work by the defendant he was seriously and permanently…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Commissioners of Marion County v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Begenish v. GatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API