Legal Opinion

Oceanic Trading Corp. v. The Freights, Sub-Freights And/or Demurrage of the Vessel Diana, American Renaissance Lines, Inc., Claimant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 3, 1970No. 504, Docket 34074PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

On March 16, 1966 Doreen Steamship Co., owner of the vessel Diana, and the appellee, Oceanic Trading Corp. (Oceanic), as charterer, entered into a time-charter of the vessel for three calendar months, the Diana to be delivered between March 21 and March 31, 1966. 1 This was a Uniform Time Charter containing the provisions adopted by The Baltic and International Maritime Conference (formerly the Baltic and White Sea Conference), as amended January 1, 1950, with the code-name “Baltime.” The parties also agreed to certain additional clauses which were attached, including…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. FreightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. The MinnetonkaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  3. Bank of British North America v. FreightsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Davis v. MuslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Baltimore Line Handling Co. v. BrophyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  3. Educational Credit Management Corp. v. Optimum WeldingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  4. Hernandez v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1997
  5. Breaking the Chain Foundation, Inc. v. Capitol Educational Support, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API