Legal Opinion

In re B.M.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 3, 1996No. 93-585PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.

The father of T.R., Mi.R. and Me.R. appeals ah order of the Chittenden Family Court terminating his parental rights. The *196children’s maternal grandmother also appeals the order, which denied her legal custody and guardianship of T.R., Mi.R. and their brother B.M.,1 but granted her petition as to Me.R.2 We affirm.

We recount the facts found by the family court insofar as they are pertinent to this appeal.3 Mother and father had been married approximately five years at the time of the termination of parental rights (TPR) hearings in February, May and June of 1993. Over those five years, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re A.F.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  2. In re M.C.P.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. In re J.R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. In re D. R.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  5. In re R. S.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re B.M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  2. In re J.T.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  3. In re D.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. In re D.C., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
  5. In re C.L.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API