Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Versaw
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
1 1 In this appeal, we decide whether language in an automobile insurance policy issued by Farmers Insurance Exchange limits recovery of a spouse for his separate loss of consortium claim to the "per person" maximum provided in the policy. The trial court held that it did. We disagree and reverse.
BACKGROUND
1 2 Mr. Don Versaw was in an automobile collision with Mrs. Corina Vierra in 1998. Mrs. Vierra sustained injuries, including a closed head injury, and incurred medical expenses which exceeded $25,000. Mrs. Vierra also lost several years' income, as the injuries she…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richards v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- LDS Hospital, a Division of Intermountain Health Care, Inc. v. Capitol Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SandtUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- Auto Lease Company v. Central Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Benjamin v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
- Headwaters Resources, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Mellor v. Wasatch Crest Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
- Tabor v. THE METAL WARE CORP.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
- Beiwei Li v. Shuyu ZhangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.