Legal Opinion

Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Versaw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 2004No. 20020747PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

1 1 In this appeal, we decide whether language in an automobile insurance policy issued by Farmers Insurance Exchange limits recovery of a spouse for his separate loss of consortium claim to the "per person" maximum provided in the policy. The trial court held that it did. We disagree and reverse.

BACKGROUND

1 2 Mr. Don Versaw was in an automobile collision with Mrs. Corina Vierra in 1998. Mrs. Vierra sustained injuries, including a closed head injury, and incurred medical expenses which exceeded $25,000. Mrs. Vierra also lost several years' income, as the injuries she…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richards v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
  2. LDS Hospital, a Division of Intermountain Health Care, Inc. v. Capitol Life Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SandtUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Auto Lease Company v. Central Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Headwaters Resources, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  3. Mellor v. Wasatch Crest Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Tabor v. THE METAL WARE CORP.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Beiwei Li v. Shuyu ZhangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API