Legal Opinion

Roman v. Township of South Hackensack

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 30, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BRAITHWAITE, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment declaring that defendants Township of South Hackensack (South Hackensack) and the may- or and members of the South Hackensack Township Committee acted in accordance with the Open Public Meetings Act (OPMA), N.J.S.A. 10:4-6 to -21, when certain promotions in the South Hackensack Police Department (Department) were made. Defendants Joseph E. Brown, Jr. and Michael Montenegro cross-appeal from that portion of the judgment denying their claims for counsel fees and costs. We conclude that South Hackensack…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Polillo v. DeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Crifasi v. Governing Body of Borough of OaklandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. Furlong v. ManningNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API