Legal Opinion
Crifasi v. Governing Body of Borough of Oakland
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 1, 1978PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
156 N.J. Super. 182 (1978)
383 A.2d 736
JACQUES CRIFASI AND EDWARD VANDERBECK, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,
v.
GOVERNING BODY OF THE BOROUGH OF OAKLAND AND JAMES MULCAHY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS AND CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 25, 1977.
Decided February 1, 1978.
Before Judges LYNCH, BISCHOFF and KOLE.
Mr. Alfred J. Villoresi argued the cause for defendants-appellants and cross-respondents (Messrs. Villoresi and Buzak, attorneys).
Mr. Malcolm Blum argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants (Messrs. Carlton &…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital v. HestonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Grogan v. DeSapioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Polillo v. DeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Dunellen Bd. of Ed. v. Dunellen Ed. Assn.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Blair v. BradySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Alaska Community Colleges' Federation of Teachers, Local No. 2404 v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
- Shalita v. Township of WashingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Clark v. DegnanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Witt v. Gloucester County Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Aronowitz v. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.