Rael v. F & S CO., INC.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDREWS, Judge.
Twelve year old Everett Rael was injured by a sudden explosion of a firework. His father filed this action against the fireworks supplier, Onda Enterprises, Ltd. (Onda), and the seller, F & S Company, Inc. (F & S). After the court dismissed cross-claims filed by both defendants in which each sought indemnity from the other, the jury returned a verdict for $7,000 for Everett and $339 for his father against both defendants jointly and severally. On appeal, F & S attacks the judgment on two unrelated grounds; first, it seeks indemnity from Onda, and second, it asserts that…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Williams MacHine & Tool Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Krametbauer v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Texaco, Inc. v. McGrew Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sandoval v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Schneider National, Inc. v. Holland Hitch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Sanchez v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hoskie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. Central New Mexico Electric Cooperative, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.