Legal Opinion
Cumberland Truck Equipment Co. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 14, 2005No. Civ.A. 05-616, Civ.A. 05-625PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SCHILLER, District Judge.
These cases arise out of alleged antitrust violations by Defendants, Detroit Diesel Corporation (“DDC”) and its distributors. DDC manufactures truck engines and has its principal place of business in Detroit, Michigan. DDC’s distributors, who are authorized to sell DDC parts and perform maintenance on DDC engines, are located throughout the country. Plaintiffs brought these class actions under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and they allege conspiracy, price fixing and group boycott undertaken by Defendants. Plaintiffs in Cumberland, Truck Equipment…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Harold Pinker, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Roche Holdings Ltd. Harold PinkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Provident National Bank v. California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- KM Enterprises Incorporated v. Global Traffic Technologies InCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Brown & Brown, Inc. v. ColaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- Stanifer v. BrannanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Synthes, Inc. v. Emerge Medical, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.