Legal Opinion

In Re Will of Casey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Emma Connor, one of the caveators, and the only living-child of the testator, was asked the following questions:

1. “What property have you now?”

2. “Did you get anything by the last will and testament of John E. Casey .

3. “How did your father treat you with reference to his treatment of your other sister while you were young ?”

The witness answered the first question “None”; the second question “No”; and the third .question, “I never had any trouble with my father.”

All,of-these questions were objected to by the propounders and the answers of the witness were stricken out, and the caveators…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bost v. . BostSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  2. In Re HintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. In Re Daniel Burns' WillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  4. In Re Will of StaubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. In Re CreecySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Will of BealeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API