Legal Opinion

Savignano v. Gloucester Housing Authority

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 3, 1962PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpalding, J.

In this action of contract the plaintiff seeks to recover for certain extra work performed and for amounts due under the contract.

The auditor, to whom the case was referred (facts to be final), found as follows: The plaintiff entered into a written contract with the defendant, dated December 26, 1957, for the construction of a State-aided housing project for elderly persons in the city of Gloucester. The contract price was $234,200. Twenty-one oral changes in the contract were ordered by the defendant’s “ clerk of works ’ ’ and were performed by the plaintiff. The plaintiff received the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Costonis v. Medford Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  2. Stuart v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Lewis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  4. Cashman v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Central Trust Co. v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Glynn v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Gamache v. Mayor of North AdamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Boston Helicopter Charter, Inc. v. Agusta Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
  4. Potter & McArthur, Inc. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Lowney v. Genrad, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API