Legal Opinion
Potter & McArthur, Inc. v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided March 11, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.
This action, brought in 1972 by Potter & McArthur, Inc. (Pomar), seeks to recover a balance allegedly due from the city under a fixed fee contract dated January 7, 1969 (and signed by the mayor on January 23, 1969). The contract was for services as naval architect in connection with a fireboat to be designed by Pomar and constructed for the city. The fixed fee of $22,600 was to be paid in accordance with a stipulated schedule based upon Pomar’s completion of specified stages of its work. The case was submitted to a Superior Court judge upon a statement of agreed facts. This incorporated by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Glynn v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Adalian Bros. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. Builders' Equipment & Supplies Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Wormstead v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Carrig v. Gilbert-Varker Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Teragram Corporation v. MarketWatch.com,Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Penta v. Concord Auto Auction, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Coady v. Wellfleet Marine Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Baltazar Contractors, Inc. v. Town of LunenburgMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Citizens for Citizens, Inc. v. LambertMassachusetts Superior Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.