Motyka v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
On Rehearing.
Clark, C. J.
Since this court in Davis v. Railway Co., 241 Mich. 166, adopted the standard of conduct laid down in Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Goodman, 275 U. S. 66 (48 Sup. Ct. 24, 56 A. L. R. 645), it has been held, quite consistently, that one about to cross a railroad track must take all reasonable precaution and be assured that it is safe to cross, and that failure so to do is contributory negligence, precluding recovery. This holding generally has been applied to so-called open crossings. But this case ought not to be treated as an open crossing case. Nor can it be said to be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Davis v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lockett v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Motyka v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Balcer v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Bishop v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Benaway v. Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.