Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Medalist Industries, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 24, 1975No. 74-370PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GUILD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment in an action seeking damages on a theory of strict products liability. The principal question presented for review is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion.

Plaintiff, Ossie Stanfield, an employee of General Electric Cabinet Co. (hereinafter G.E.) suffered the loss of three fingers of her left hand while operating a boring and cutting machine for the first time. The machine had been manufactured by the defendant Medalist…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Ney v. Yellow Cab Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Dunham v. Vaughan & Bushnell Mfg. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Winnett v. WinnettIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Kerns v. EngelkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Doran v. Pullman Standard Car Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. Christopher J. Reed, John Christopher Reed, Dorothy Reed v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API