Legal Opinion

Haughton v. Bilson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1911No. 16,875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Greenwood district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

A survey was had under the statute for the purpose of locating the center of a section. The surveyor decided that a stone monument which he discovered should be regarded as marking such corner, on the theory that it had been set for that purpose in the course of an earlier survey, although it was in fact twenty-two feet west of the true or mathematical cen*130ter. John Haughton and others appealed from the surveyor’s report. Upon a trial in the district court it was affirmed. Later Haughton and those having interests in common with him filed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hart v. BrainerdSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Town of Manson v. WareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  3. State v. TysonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haughton v. BilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Davis v. SimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. In re NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  4. Zoglio v. T. W. Waterman Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1916
  5. Woods-Ringstaff Lumber Co. v. PondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API