Legal Opinion

Woods-Ringstaff Lumber Co. v. Pond

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 8, 1963No. 43,100PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This was an action to foreclose a subcontractor’s lien for materials used on real estate. (G. S. 1949, 60-1403.) Trial was by the court and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff lumber company, and the defendants Pond have appealed.

This case was here previously. (Woods-Ringstaff Lumber Co. v. Pond, 188 Kan. 369, 362 P. 2d 615.) No further reference is necessary to that appeal other than to note that it was held the district court erred in denying the defendants the right to file amended answers.

The pertinent facts in this appeal are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. TysonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  2. Haughton v. BilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Blake v. National Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. Davis v. SimSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Woods-Ringstaff Lumber Co. v. PondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. TURNER, SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION v. GilbreathCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API