United States v. Niedzielski
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
MURDOCK, Judge:
The appellant was found guilty, pursuant to his pleas, of one specification of larceny of checking account funds and one specification of forgery (uttering falsely made checks to the base exchange). Now he asserts that the military judge erred in finding the specifications separate for sentence. We agree.
The charges stem from the appellant’s theft of about 28 of his roommate’s checks. Over a two month period the appellant made the checks payable to his order, and cashed them at the local base exchange, receiving cash in return. At trial, the proof consisted of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. OmpadUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
- United States v. RidgewayU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. BeaverU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. DoneganU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. CumbeeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. IgnatkoU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991