Jackson v. Smith

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 178 Ohio St.3d 197.] JACKSON, APPELLANT, v. SMITH,1 WARDEN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Jackson v. Smith,

2024-Ohio-4742.] Habeas corpus—Inmate’s claims, including challenge to conviction for firearm specification based on indictment’s citation of wrong statute, are not cognizable in habeas, and direct appeal was adequate remedy in ordinary course of law—Court of appeals’ dismissal of petition affirmed. (No. 2024-0033—Submitted July 9, 2024—Decided October 2, 2024.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Belmont County, No. 23 BE 0014,

2023-Ohio-…