Legal Opinion

Carr v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 7, 2015No. 3:15-cv-1026-MPublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DAVID L. HORAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“Defendant” or “State Farm”) has filed a Motion to Compel Plaintiffs Discovery Responses and Oral Deposition. See Dkt, No. 14. United States District Judge Barbara M.G. Lynn referred the motion to the undersigned United States magistrate judge for determination. See Dkt. No. 15.

For the reasons and to the extent explained below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiffs Discovery Responses and Oral Deposition [Dkt. No. 14].

Background

This case arises…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McLeod Alexander, Powel & Apffel, P.C. v. Fred H. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Frank Landry v. Air Line Pilots Association International Afl-Cio, Taca Airlines, S.A. And Charles J. HuttingerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. In Re Terra International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Murphy v. Deloitte & Touche Group Insurance PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Jan Vallejo v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. Yang Kun "Michael" ChungDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2017
  3. in Re State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Orchestratehr, Inc. v. TrombettaDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
  5. Mir v. L-3 Communications Integrated Systems, L.P.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API