Legal Opinion

Petron Scientech Inc v. Ronald Zapletal

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 14, 2017No. 16-1091 & 16-1119UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

ROTH, Circuit Judge

Petron Scientech, Inc., and Yogendra Sarin had numerous business dealings with Ronald P. Zapletal and Aluchem, Inc., over the course of several years. These dealings culminated in a joint venture that ultimately failed. Both sides then asserted contractual claims against each other. Zapletal and Aluchem also requested an award of attorney fees because they believed that Petron and Sarin had made frivolous claims. After a bench trial, the District Court held that no party was entitled to any damages or fees from any other party. Both sides appealed. We will affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  2. Atlantic Northern Airlines, Inc. v. SchwimmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Wilson v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. Route 18 Shopping Center AssociatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. Furst v. Einstein Moomjy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Culwick v. WoodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  2. In re Denby-PetersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  3. SCIORE v. PHUNGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API