Legal Opinion

In Re Appropriation of Easements for Hwy. Purposes Over Property of Forte

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1967No. 1734Published

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

Appellants, whose property was appropriated by the State Highway Department, are dissatisfied with the jury verdict and are questioning the procedure followed in the Common Pleas Court. There is no bill of exceptions filed in this case.

The first assignment of error concerns the description of the property contained in the copy of the resolution filed by the Director of Highways, which is as follows:

“The aforementioned property to be appropriated is located in Lot 23, Town 5 North, Range 1 "West, Hartford Township, Trumbull County, Ohio, lying on the left side of the centerline of a survey…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baughman v. Director of HighwaysOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. In Re Appropriation of Easement for Highway PurposesOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Thormyer v. Dueber Realty, Inc.Stark County Court of Common Pleas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API