Legal Opinion

Baughman v. Director of Highways

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1964No. 661, 662, 663 and 664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGuernsey, J.

In each of the above-captioned highway appropriation cases appeals on questions of law have been perfected by the Director of Highways from judgments of the Common Pleas Court of Hancock County entered pursuant to landowners’ motions. As the same issues were raised by each appeal they have been argued and will be considered together.

In the Baughman case the judgment entry of the Common Pleas Court recited that no evidence was adduced at the hearing of the motion and found that: “The resolution and finding filed herein is not a true copy as required by law, since the signature of the Director…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Director of Highways v. SpiceOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Preston v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Appropriation of Easements for Hwy. Purposes Over Property of ForteOhio Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API