Legal Opinion

Thomas Pinner v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 24, 2016No. 49A02-1511-CR-2036PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

[1] Thomas Pinner appeals the denial of his motion to suppress. As no reasonable suspicion justified the investigatory stop, we reverse.

Facts and Procedural History

[2] On February 20, 2015, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department officers Jason Palmer and George Stewart responded to a call from a cab driver regarding a passenger who dropped a handgun when exiting the cab at the Studio Movie Grill. The cab driver described the passenger as “a black male wearing a blue jacket [accompanied by] a black female with blonde hair.” (App. at 13.) The driver indicated he was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Campos v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Crabtree v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas Pinner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API