Legal Opinion

Keith MacH. Corp. v. South Plainfield

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 17, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

89 N.J. Super. 584 (1965)

215 A.2d 788

KEITH MACHINERY CORPORATION, A NEW YORK CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

THE BOROUGH OF SOUTH PLAINFIELD AND JOHN BORI, TAX COLLECTOR, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided December 17, 1965.

Mr. Robert Silver for plaintiff (Messrs. Bilder, Bilder, Silver & McCurley, attorneys).

Mr. John T. Keefe for defendants (Mr. Edward J. Santoro, attorney).

GEROFSKY, J.S.C.

This is a declaratory judgment action involving the construction of an act of the Legislature known as the Moving Permit Statute (N.J.S.A. 40:52A-1 et seq.) and an ordinance enacted on…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Watt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of FranklinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Grogan v. DeSapioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. New Jersey Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Howard Savings Institution v. KielbSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. Oldfield v. New Jersey Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of ByronNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Morgan v. Air Brook Limousine, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  3. Diament v. Borough of Fort LeeNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  4. Mountain Hill, L.L.C. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Mt. Hill, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Township of MiddletownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API