Legal Opinion

Burton v. Wynne

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 15, 1876PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Garnishment. Bond. Attorney and client. Promissory notes. Evidence. Before Judge Pottle. Wilkes Superior Court. November Term, 1875. Reported in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Judge.

Wynne brought suit against Dunn, and had process of garnishment issued against Burton. Burton answered that 1m owed nothing. Wynne traversed the answer and showed that Burton had owed Dunn on a promissory note, payable one day after date, and made some time before. Burton replied that he had paid the note to Mattox who got it from Dunn, and claimed that he was thereby protected. The court charged the jury that the whole question turned on whether Mattox purchased 'the note before or after Burton was served with the summons, or in other words, whether when served he owed Mattox…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Levin v. American Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Carmichael Tile Co. v. Yaarab Temple Building Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Husband Bros. v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Kesler v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API