Legal Opinion

State v. Marti

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 7, 1996No. 94-637PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.

The defendant, Antonio Marti, was convicted on three indictments alleging aggravated felonious sexual assault. See RSA 632-A:2 (1986 & Supp. 1991) (amended 1992). On appeal, he argues that the Superior Court (Dickson, J.) erred in admitting evidence of his numerous prior sexual assaults on the victim. He also argues that the court erred in precluding cross-examination of the victim about a prior inconsistent statement and illegal drug use. We reverse the defendant’s convictions because it was error to admit evidence of the prior sexual assaults and, therefore, leave the remaining issues in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. VandebogartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. State v. McGlewSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. KirschSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  4. State v. WoodburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. State v. HennesseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  3. State v. MartiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  4. State v. PelkeySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  5. State v. GlodgettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API