Legal Opinion

State v. Pierce

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1992No. 90-1898PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

In this appeal, we are presented with important issues relating to the admissibility of DNA evidence in a criminal prosecution.1 For the following reasons, we hold that such evidence may be admissible and that questions regarding the reliability of such evidence go to its weight rather than its admissibility.

I

The Scientific Background of DNA Evidence

DNA is the common abbreviation for deoxyribonucleic acid. DNA is the “fundamental natural material which determines the genetic characteristics of all life forms.” People v. Castro (Sup.Ct.1989), 144 Misc.2d 956, 961, 545 N.Y.S.2d 985, 988. It is…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Randolph JakobetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Spencer v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1990
  5. People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LangOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ClintonOhio Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Miller v. Bike Athletic Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API