Legal Opinion

Spray v. Board of Medical Examiners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1981No. CA 14039PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Both parties have petitioned for reconsideration of our decision in Spray v. Bd. of Medical Examiners, 50 Or App 311, 624 P2d 125 (1981). Rule 10.10, Rules of Appellate Procedure. The petition of petitioner Spray is denied. The petition of respondent Board of Medical Examiners (Board) is granted, and our former opinion is modified in the manner described below.

In our opinion in Spray, 50 Or App at 326-329, we held that the Board’s meeting to decide Dr. Spray’s case should have been open to the public. That was error. ORS 192.690 provides, in pertinent part,

"(1) [The Open Meetings Law] shall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spray v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. De St. Germain v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Trebesch v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Britton v. Board of Podiatry ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Brady v. Bureau of Labor and IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. McKay v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API